This blog post is in response to recent reports regarding the American Medical Association’s June 2009 resolution that included this statement: “If obesity is designated as a disability, physicians could be sued or reprimanded for discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act if a patient is offended by discussions of the problem.” (See, e.g., this ABC News report.)
In the three months since that June 2009 resolution was passed, I still have not been able to find the full text of that resolution online. Suffice it to say, the AMA’s reasons for resolution are lacking. To date, only a few bloggers have discussed their responses to this resolution: here, there, and over yonder.

Caption: A doctor stands next to a slightly overweight patient who is not wearing a shirt.
The Americans with Disabilities Act is an important federal law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability. The law provides expansive protection for individuals with disabilities in a variety of situations. In the context of physicians, clinics, and hospitals, the Americans with Disabilities Act requires, among other things, compliance with building accessibility as well as providing patients reasonable accommodation, such as sign language interpreters for the deaf and hearing impaired.
I am not aware of any provision in the Americans with Disabilities Act that provides patients the right to sue physicians for simply discussing the patients’ disability during consultations. Nor am I aware of any case in which a patient has sued a physician under the Americans with Disabilities Act for simply addressing a health issue the patient allegedly may have had during consultations.
Therefore, in the context of patient-physician consultations, it is not clear what the American Medical Association seeks to accomplish by passing a resolution to reject efforts to make obesity a disability.
Obesity is a serious health issue. Clearly, it is important that physicians discuss obesity with their patients. However, it is equally important that physicians not harbor exaggerated or unwarranted fear of litigation. Therefore, for the sake of clarity, I encourage the American Medical Association to explain why it is singling out obesity and how the Americans with Disabilities Act is implicated with regard to patient-physician consultations. In addition, I encourage the American Medical Association to engage in open dialogue with attorneys knowledgeable in disability law before passing similiar resolutions.
© 2009, Matthew Stoloff. All rights reserved.
No related posts.
-
We’re going down the road where the advice from a physician will be vague and couched in disclaimers. It is imperative for honesty in the patient-physician relationship, without the thoughts of “I’m gonna get sued and screwed if I say that….”
I’m not suggesting that physicians should have licence to say “hey you’re out of breath because you’re a fat bastard” but sometimes a little tough love from your advisor is a great thing.
Skirting around issues such as this only reinforces the compensation culture.
Get honest – get real.
-
Wow, I’m not sure how I feel about this article. The fact that obesity could be claimed as a disability is a bit unsettling. I’m sure there are a few cases where it could be legit, but are we opening a door for the lazy to find another easy way out with self made disabilities?
As far as a doctor being able to discuss health issues open and honestly, if my doctor wouldn’t have been open and honest with me, about a year and half ago, I’d be dead today.
Great article though and excellent food for thought!
Cheers!
Rex

2 comments
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link: http://stoloff-law.com/blog/an-invitation-to-an-open-dialogue-with-the-ama/trackback/