<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Identifying Money by Color and Touch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stoloff-law.com/blog/identifying-money-by-color-and-touch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stoloff-law.com/blog/identifying-money-by-color-and-touch/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 02:30:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Stoloff</title>
		<link>/blog/identifying-money-by-color-and-touch/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Stoloff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoloff-law.com/blog/?p=61#comment-115</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment.

I applaud the federal judges who held that the US currency fails to comply with 504. However, I agree that if the courts had set a timetable, things would be put in motion much faster. Your suggested 5 year timetable sounds very reasonable.

Lobbying the federal government may be a good idea. It may be helpful to have Congress impose a timetable on the Bureau of Engraving and Printing to do all that is necessary to comply with 504. Perhaps a letter to your Senator may help speed things along.

By the way, did you see the summary of the Treasury Department&#039;s status report at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.numismaster.com/ta/numis/Article.jsp?ad=article&amp;ArticleId=7364&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Numismatic.com&lt;/a&gt;? Apparently, printing currency with raised tactile marks may cost $6.6 billion. I wonder how that number was calculated. I doubt that Japan and other countries invested that much money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment.</p>
<p>I applaud the federal judges who held that the US currency fails to comply with 504. However, I agree that if the courts had set a timetable, things would be put in motion much faster. Your suggested 5 year timetable sounds very reasonable.</p>
<p>Lobbying the federal government may be a good idea. It may be helpful to have Congress impose a timetable on the Bureau of Engraving and Printing to do all that is necessary to comply with 504. Perhaps a letter to your Senator may help speed things along.</p>
<p>By the way, did you see the summary of the Treasury Department&#8217;s status report at <a href="http://www.numismaster.com/ta/numis/Article.jsp?ad=article&#038;ArticleId=7364" rel="nofollow">Numismatic.com</a>? Apparently, printing currency with raised tactile marks may cost $6.6 billion. I wonder how that number was calculated. I doubt that Japan and other countries invested that much money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara</title>
		<link>/blog/identifying-money-by-color-and-touch/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 02:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoloff-law.com/blog/?p=61#comment-103</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s almost as if the government is saying that there&#039;s not a large enough population of visually impaired people to justify the expense of printing new currency. What an excuse, eh?  Most people I know fold their money in certain ways or separate bills into different pockets of the wallet.  What if you accidentally misplace your $20 for your 5 dollar bill, and you give the $20 to the waitress instead of a $5?  Is the waitress likely to give the customer the exact change or take advantage of the situation?

I forsee something coming out of this eventually, but maybe we&#039;re looking at a 5 year program.  Any suggestions on lobbying or sending info to our representatives?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s almost as if the government is saying that there&#8217;s not a large enough population of visually impaired people to justify the expense of printing new currency. What an excuse, eh?  Most people I know fold their money in certain ways or separate bills into different pockets of the wallet.  What if you accidentally misplace your $20 for your 5 dollar bill, and you give the $20 to the waitress instead of a $5?  Is the waitress likely to give the customer the exact change or take advantage of the situation?</p>
<p>I forsee something coming out of this eventually, but maybe we&#8217;re looking at a 5 year program.  Any suggestions on lobbying or sending info to our representatives?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

